This is actually true.
- VanHockeyGuy

Pressy absolutely schooling the champs you honestly have to love it.

Very Booner-esque.



Three full years of lies and they're still slurping the narrative. Remarkable.

Thanks JT and Biden voters!!


- LordHumungous

Pressy absolutely schooling the champs you honestly have to love it.

Very Booner-esque.



Three full years of lies and they're still slurping the narrative. Remarkable.
- LordHumungous

I think you need to go back to school to understand what “schooling” means.

Political parties influence big businesses through pressure tactics all the time. Nothing new, nothing surprising. Elon released documents that showed Twitter allegedly suppressing typical “right leaning” talking points.

Of course the Alt-right seized on this as a “I told you so” moment and evidence of “liberal bias” even though the files did not demonstrate much more than Twitter's policy team having a difficult time grappling with questionable content.

Republican officials also made the same kinds of requests. Well documented within Twitter but never released? I wonder why? Hmmmmm. Maybe it didn’t fit a particular owner’s narrative?

https://www.rollingstone....en-censorship-1234675969/

Politics is an ugly game full of ugly players, yet some in here are so enamoured with radical Republicans that they forget that no political figure should be trusted because for the most part, they are all out for personal gain.
- bloatedmosquito

Rolling Stone...

But I do agree somewhat that all politicians can't be trusted.

There are days when I wish we would all stop arguing and just come together to do what's right as that day is coming soon.

I think you need to go back to school to understand what “schooling” means.
- bloatedmosquito

Actually kind of shocked you are one of the slurpers pushing these narratives. After what we've seen the past three years and the lies and corruption I expected much more of you. But, we are who we are. Pressy have taken you all to task and all you are capable of is posting State-run gov't links. Admirable lol.

Whatever will you do when this starts happening:

https://www.brasscheck.co...ew-lock-downs-are-coming/

Will you stand and fight or just comply like a good little sheep?

Food for thought bud.

Actually kind of shocked you are one of the slurpers pushing these narratives. After what we've seen the past three years and the lies and corruption I expected much more of you. But, we are who we are. Pressy have taken you all to task and all you are capable of is posting State-run gov't links. Admirable lol.

Whatever will you do when this starts happening:

https://www.brasscheck.co...ew-lock-downs-are-coming/

Will you stand and fight or just comply like a good little sheep?

Food for thought bud.
- LordHumungous

TBH, I have no idea what you are rambling on about now. I was laughing at your assessment of the term “schooling”.

Absolutely fascinating…

https://seymourhersh.subs...paign=post&utm_medium=web

Report on the US being responsible for the Nordstream pipeline attack.

TBH, I have no idea what you are rambling on about now. I was laughing at your assessment of the term “schooling”.
- bloatedmosquito

I mean you guys can't even find a single example of a healthy 6 to 19 year old who died of covid in BC but resort to name calling to protect your Religious Order. It's pretty pathetic how obvious it is.

I mean you guys can't even find a single example of a healthy 6 to 19 year old who died of covid in BC but resort to name calling to protect your Religious Order. It's pretty pathetic how obvious it is.
- Pres.cup

Religious neo-left fanatics who can't counter a single point without name calling or citing 'safe and effective'.

Just sad is all.

I mean you guys can't even find a single example of a healthy 6 to 19 year old who died of covid in BC but resort to name calling to protect your Religious Order. It's pretty pathetic how obvious it is.
- Pres.cup

I provided the data already so shut it.

http://www.bccdc.ca/Healt...ituation_Report.pdf#page7

There was one confirmed death of a child in BC under the age of 10. There was 0 deaths from Covid for age groups 11 - 19. So your point being, if young people don’t die then there’s no reason why young people should take the vaccine?

Absolutely fascinating…

https://seymourhersh.subs...paign=post&utm_medium=web

Report on the US being responsible for the Nordstream pipeline attack.
- bloatedmosquito

You see bloated this is exactly what I've been talking about.

This was well known months ago.

Critical thinking and research dude...give it a go.

You see bloated this is exactly what I've been talking about.

This was well known months ago.

Critical thinking and research dude...give it a go.


- LordHumungous

You commenting on critical thinking is awesome. Thanks for the laugh.

You commenting on critical thinking is awesome. Thanks for the laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

Are you saying it's not possible?

Are you saying it's not possible?
- VanHockeyGuy

What’s not possible? I don’t understand your question.

I provided the data already so shut it.

http://www.bccdc.ca/Healt...ituation_Report.pdf#page7

There was one confirmed death of a child in BC under the age of 10. There was 0 deaths from Covid for age groups 11 - 19. So your point being, if young people don’t die then there’s no reason why young people should take the vaccine?
- bloatedmosquito

"Healthy" children. Your data says one person under 19 died with covid.... one person died within 28 days of a positive covid test...?

That's your proof that healthy children needed to take the jab out they'd be at risk of dying.

Don't need to take it, coerced to take it and not offered it in the first place are three very different things.

1. The government coerced young healthy people to take it.

2. The government lied about it being safe and effective. It was not safe to some and 5 jabs later it's not very effective.

3. The government probably shouldn't have even offered it but that's not why I'm upset about it.

4. They lied and used violent threats(coercion is defined as a violent act against autonomy) to make people take the vaccine all the while using back channels to shape the official narrative to make it seem like there was consensus around the vaccine by silencing any scientist or doctor who expressed concern.

The wormhole goes deeper but an easy thread to disagree with the government on is how they sewed fear and coercion on healthy people who were not at risk into participating in a drug trial.

The vaccine is a sunk cost fallacy.

"Healthy" children. Your data says one person under 19 died with covid.... one person died within 28 days of a positive covid test...?

That's your proof that healthy children needed to take the jab out they'd be at risk of dying.

Don't need to take it, coerced to take it and not offered it in the first place are three very different things.

1. The government coerced young healthy people to take it.

2. The government lied about it being safe and effective. It was not safe to some and 5 jabs later it's not very effective.

3. The government probably shouldn't have even offered it but that's not why I'm upset about it.

4. They lied and used violent threats(coercion is defined as a violent act against autonomy) to make people take the vaccine all the while using back channels to shape the official narrative to make it seem like there was consensus around the vaccine by silencing any scientist or doctor who expressed concern.

The wormhole goes deeper but an easy thread to disagree with the government on is how they sewed fear and coercion on healthy people who were not at risk into participating in a drug trial.

The vaccine is a sunk cost fallacy.
- Pres.cup

You said no children under the age of 19 died from COVID in BC. I showed that statement to be incorrect. You were wrong (again). One died. You and I don’t have access to that child’s health record so there is no basis for assessing that child’s health prior to COVID infection.

The rest is just conjecture. And to help you out, conjecture means: “an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information”

I should be getting paid. Being burdened with the responsibility of educating you people is exhausting.

You commenting on critical thinking is awesome. Thanks for the laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

Just trying to help. But you are too far gone into the narrative.

'One of the slickest globalist moves is how they turned their depopulation agenda into a social movement where the very people they aim to kill rally for their own extinction. Fucking top-notch evil sorcery right there...touche'

You said no children under the age of 19 died from COVID in BC. I showed that statement to be incorrect. You were wrong (again). One died. You and I don’t have access to that child’s health record so there is no basis for assessing that child’s health prior to COVID infection.

The rest is just conjecture. And to help you out, conjecture means: “an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information”
- bloatedmosquito

I wrote no "healthy" children 6 to 19 died of covid in BC.
A toddler who had a severe heart condition died with covid. A tragedy and I feel for his parents.

No healthy children between the ages of 6 and 19 died of covid in bc. That's a fact, dude.

After searching and finding that healthy children aren't at risk of covid, do you still support the use of coercion and fear to try and force young healthy children to get the jab?

Just trying to help. But you are too far gone into the narrative.

'One of the slickest globalist moves is how they turned their depopulation agenda into a social movement where the very people they aim to kill rally for their own extinction. Fucking top-notch evil sorcery right there...touche'


- LordHumungous

Need to start small, once they start seeing the discrepancy it all starts to unravel.

The jabbing of healthy children is the most obvious as they never needed the jab. The problem is got the parents to realize this they need to understand their own complicity in the abuse.

Need to start small, once they start seeing the discrepancy it all starts to unravel.

The jabbing of healthy children is the most obvious as they never needed the jab. The problem is got the parents to realize this they need to understand their own complicity in the abuse.
- Pres.cup

You of all people should not be commenting on parenting, so slow down on your rhetoric.

I wrote no "healthy" children 6 to 19 died of covid in BC.
A 4yo boy who had a severe heart condition died with covid. A tragedy and I feel for his parents.

No healthy children between the ages of 6 and 19 died of covid in bc. That's a fact, dude.

After searching and finding that healthy children aren't at risk of covid, do you still support the use of coercion and fear to try and force young healthy children to get the jab?
- Pres.cup

you have no idea if that child had a “severe” condition or not. Do you have a copy of that child’s health records? Again, that’s your narrative getting in the way.

Healthy children are at risk of complication due to COVID infection. Death is unlikely but is still possible and has happened contrary to your BS.

You of all people should not be commenting on parenting, so slow down on your rhetoric.
- bloatedmosquito

Why?

I am a dutiful father who the Courts have seen fit to be the primary parent with final decision making for two young children. The judicial system sees me as a fit parent and acknowledged my opinion on this specific subject to be more relevant to two healthy children than the "official" narrative.

Why, when I just got awarded custody for the second time would I not be one to comment on parenting?

I didn't assume you forced your children to take the jab although your response seems to be of a parent who did. Is that correct and if so you shouldn't be mad at me, you should be mad at the government for misleading you.

you have no idea if that child had a “severe” condition or not. Do you have a copy of that child’s health records? Again, that’s your narrative getting in the way.

Healthy children are at risk of complication due to COVID infection. Death is unlikely but is still possible and has happened contrary to your BS.
- bloatedmosquito

It was all over the front pages of the news cycle, the second he died that a toddler had died of covid. In the back pages it noted that he was in the hospital for his severe heart condition when he caught covid.

I also provided studies showing how rare it was for any young person to be severely impacted by covid.

You said no children under the age of 19 died from COVID in BC. I showed that statement to be incorrect. You were wrong (again). One died. You and I don’t have access to that child’s health record so there is no basis for assessing that child’s health prior to COVID infection.

The rest is just conjecture. And to help you out, conjecture means: “an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information”
- bloatedmosquito

Safe implies no risk. There are documented risks, some vaccines were even pulled off the market. No conjecture.

The government coerced people, that's a fact. No conjecture.

The vaccines drop to under 30 percent efficiency after 9 months. That's not effective. No conjecture.

Healthy children were never at risk from covid. Statistical fact, not conjecture.

I am failing to see your arguement as having any relevancy or truth as that it's backed only by the "official narrative" and not by any actual scientifically valid facts.

Feelings are not facts, your fear isn't a fact. Blanket statements like "safe and effective" and "for the greater good" are marketing headlines, not facts.