at least he brought it here and mostly kept it out of the main thread. baby steps.
- RealityChecker

booner and a couple of others really do drive people away from this site. and they project that onto others. it's weird.
- RealityChecker

Yup. Hell Booner had his own chat rooms and everyone else stopped going.

having someone challenge your opinions or present alternate opinions (even if it's 100 opinions to 1 dissenting opinion) is not diminishing free speech.

it's funny how you think that people screaming down stupidity is challenging free speech. posters on this site are not the ones who limit your speech. you can say pretty much any stupid thing your little head desires. it doesn't mean that others won't point and call out the paranoiac fever dreams masquerading as political opinion. when those insanities totally go over the rails, moderators are brought in to see if they comport with the rules of this private enterprise.

there has never been free speech on this website. i simply refer you to the code of conduct.

there are limits on all speech in this country as you're aware. and there are limits on speech on the country below us which advertises "freedom of speech."

simply put, you and your cohorts want to babble without consequence. sorry, but there are enough people who don't need or want to put up with your utter bullsh!t.
- RealityChecker

Look in the quote you just posted... I said limits to free speech in here are acceptable. Are you ever stupid.

Another pointless narrative.

DP

You know whats funny, how you guys wash your hands of the trouble you create.

Codes and I would have moved on if your clique didnt stick your nose in it and escalate the entire situation. You could have stayed out of it instead of gaining up. He could have simply said "no need to jump in guys" and we would have moved on. That was the first blow out between him and I ever. Everything else was only a small skirmish in the past and that was only a couple of times. I never disliked him over any of it. He came clean about hating me over it though.

So instead, he welcomes the gang up, takes it another step and kept bragging about having your support as you guys started running your mouth with all the old fiction.

Codes couldnt control what people were saying in the main thread so he hides in here from it of all places. Then he freaks out in here when people talk politics about China. Then he freaks out because I'm in here addressing what he and you guys were saying about me. When he couldnt control that, he quits HB.

It was like I said all along. Control freak.

I re-read the 1st page of Carol's blog and surprise!!! Booner's full of self-pitying sh*t.
- Marwood

What the (frank) are you talking about?

You guys selfishly brought the beef onto the first page of Carols blog. Not me. WTF???

Holy poop you guys lie.

You know whats funny, how you guys wash your hands of the trouble you create.

Codes and I would have moved on if your clique didnt stick your nose in it and escalate the entire situation. You could have stayed out of it instead of gaining up. He could have simply said "no need to jump in guys" and we would have moved on. That was the first blow out between him and I ever. Everything else was only a small skirmish in the past and that was only a couple of times. I never disliked him over any of it. He came clean about hating me over it though.

So instead, he welcomes the gang up, takes it another step and kept bragging about having your support as you guys started running your mouth with all the old fiction.

Codes couldnt control what people were saying in the main thread so you hides in here from it of all places. Then he freaks out in here when people talk politics about China. Then he freaks out because I'm in here addressing what he and you guys were saying about me. When he couldnt control that, he quits HB.

It was like I said all along. Control freak.
- boonerbuck

your need to portray codes (of all people) as a control freak and anyone who dares disagrees with you (or agrees with any of your MULTIPLE "antagonists") as part of some clique says more about you than them.

it's time to look at yourself.

oh, who am i kidding? you have no power for introspection. all you need is someone to point the finger at and blame. so cry your little eyes out you fcuking victim.

Yup. Hell Booner had his own chat rooms and everyone else stopped going.
- golfingsince

I stopped going because of my internet problems. I handed it off to someone else. It was closed when the main site on the server was sold.

The hunters on HB probably spent time there even. My friend who owned the server lives in Victoria.

your need to portray codes (of all people) as a control freak and anyone who dares disagrees with you (or agrees with any of your MULTIPLE "antagonists" as part of some clique) says more about you than them.

it's time to look at yourself.

oh, who am i kidding? you have no power for introspection. all you need is someone to point the finger at and blame. so cry your little eyes out you fcuking victim.
- RealityChecker

Do you really believe that anyone who reads this thread and all the attacks and lengthy discussions your brainless clique runs on about every day sees anything but bully behavior and instigation? You guys single people out in the main thread and attack as a group until you get told to crawl back under your rock where you continue the bullpoop day after day in here.

Stop pretending Codes was innocent in all this. Him trying to deescalate the situation in the main thread was phony as usual. When someone says they dont want to argue but ends the posts with projecting something the other person doesnt think or add a little back handed comment, it's just dishonesty.

Good job on making the situation so bad your little buddy left. Why don't you stay out of other people's arguments... answer is simple... you want it to escalate. Own your part in it you imbecile.

Do you really believe that anyone who reads this thread and all the attacks and lengthy discussions your brainless clique runs on about every day sees anything but bully behavior and instigation? You guys single people out in the main thread and attack as a group until you get told to crawl back under your rock where you continue the bullpoop day after day in here.

Stop pretending Codes was innocent in all this. Him trying to deescalate the situation in the main thread was phony as usual. When someone says they dont want to argue but ends the posts with projecting something the other person doesnt think or add a little back handed comment, it's just dishonesty.

Good job on making the situation so bad your little buddy left. Why don't you stay out of other people's arguments... answer is simple... you want it to escalate. Own your part in it you imbecile.
- boonerbuck

sure, i'll own my part. i think you're a crying b!tch and i have no problem telling you that when you act in that manner. that's why i interject myself when i do.

you, nor anyone else asks but i feel compelled to tell you that you're a crying little b!tch when you're being a crying little b!tch. guilty as charged. that generally escalates things.

since we're being honest, how about you do the same. you made that original post and then took a jab at codes prior to him saying anything because you wanted the fight.

you had some previous fight you wanted to litigate and this was the easiest way to open it up. that's entirely your MO. are you going to be honest and admit it?

EDIT: Do you see what you do? He left because he couldn't take your BS. He explicitly said that... and you go and blame me for it. This is you in a nutshell: blame and play the victim. Thanks for being so blatant about it.

What the (frank) are you talking about?

You guys selfishly brought the beef onto the first page of Carols blog. Not me. WTF???

Holy poop you guys lie.
- boonerbuck

You have so many triggers.

Ironic that on a Sunday, your crying is of biblical proportions.

sure, i'll own my part. i think you're a crying b!tch and i have no problem telling you that when you act in that manner. that's why i interject myself when i do.

you, nor anyone else asks but i feel compelled to tell you that you're a crying little b!tch when you're being a crying little b!tch. guilty as charged. that generally escalates things.

since we're being honest, how about you do the same. you made that original post and then took a jab at codes prior to him saying anything because you wanted the fight.

you had some previous fight you wanted to litigate and this was the easiest way to open it up. that's entirely your MO. are you going to be honest and admit it?

EDIT: Do you see what you do? He left because he couldn't take your BS. He explicitly said that... and you go and blame me for it. This is you in a nutshell: blame and play the victim. Thanks for being so blatant about it.
- RealityChecker

See, you lie again. It wasnt a previous fight because I didnt take the bait. He played the same game with the projections and sly back handed comments about a link I posted to BCTV and I stayed polite and didnt fight with him about it. He still came in here crying about it.

You are a liar... always have been. Just make stories up about people so you can attack them. You wanted this to blow out of hand and now you are crying about it. You've always done this to people.

You part in bold is very hypocritical.

See, you lie again. It wasnt a previous fight because I didnt take the bait. He played the same game with the projections and sly back handed comments about a link I posted to BCTV and I stayed polite and didnt fight with him about it. He still came in here crying about it.

You are a liar... always have been. Just make stories up about people so you can attack them. You wanted this to blow out of hand and now you are crying about it. You've always done this to people.

You part in bold is very hypocritical.
- boonerbuck

you made a post taking a jab at him ("makes him grumpy") before he even posted a response to you and he's the one setting the "bait?"

it's always someone else's fault according to you. at a certain point, you gotta look in the mirror.

you made a post taking a jab at him ("makes him grumpy") before he even posted a response to you and he's the one setting the "bait?"

it's always someone else's fault according to you. at a certain point, you gotta look in the mirror.
- RealityChecker

Another lie. You referenced a past fight that didnt exist because I chose not to take the bait. I said nothing about being baited this time.

You are a compulsive liar. Post after post.

I love the narrative that Booner cant drop something. Day 3 of you guys running your mouth about me. Even codes asked you to stop on day 2 eventually. Now he's sick of it and gone and you guys as usual deflect your part in it.

laughy face

Another lie. You referenced a past fight that didnt exist because I chose not to take the bait. I said nothing about being baited this time.

You are a compulsive liar. Post after post.
- boonerbuck

Will this be in your book?

Another lie. You referenced a past fight that didnt exist because I chose not to take the bait. I said nothing about being baited this time.

You are a compulsive liar. Post after post.
- boonerbuck

this is getting redudant to the point of "no, i didn't," "yes, you did." but...

1) you made post of italian doctor;
2) you agreed with a vantel post with a comment that took a jab/swipe at codes; and then
3) codes responded.

my point is that you wanted a fight with codes prior to the italian doctor post and that post was meant to instigate something. you further poked codes with a direct comment. it was those actions that i say were provocations.

and now you claim that it was he that tried to provoke you but you didn't take the "bait."

so don't bother responding of no i didn't and you lie. i know that you lack the strength to look inward to see that you did this and it is a pattern of behaviour for you.

and on and on the circle goes. this is what disagreements are with you. circles. so i'll end it with... Yes, you did.

you made a post taking a jab at him ("makes him grumpy") before he even posted a response to you and he's the one setting the "bait?"

it's always someone else's fault according to you. at a certain point, you gotta look in the mirror.
- RealityChecker

It’s called High Conflict Personality Disorder.

https://www.pchtreatment....igh-conflict-personality/

Will this be in your book?
- Marwood

volume 1 - street fights
volumes 2 through 23,493 - internet fights

Will this be in your book?
- Marwood

Don't pretend you guys know what a book is.

laughy face

volume 1 - street fights
volumes 2 through 23,493 - internet fights
- RealityChecker

It’s called High Conflict Personality Disorder.

https://www.pchtreatment....igh-conflict-personality/
- bloatedmosquito

It’s called High Conflict Personality Disorder.

https://www.pchtreatment....igh-conflict-personality/
- bloatedmosquito

If anyone fits that its your friend Smallwood.

No one on HB has more issues with people than Smallwood. The list is ridiculously long and many have left because of him and the clique. He attacks every new HB user that shows up just in case it's one of the people he chased away over not liking what they say or how they post. If you take away this group think clique, my arguments are a lot fewer. It looks a lot worse than it is because an argument with one twit is a brawl with 5 every time.

Its always everyone else. You guys are angels.

- RealityChecker

Awesome character performance by Hugh Laurie!