So you’re back to crediting the run game and not the “threatofthepass” but when Cleveland stomped Tennessee through the air it was because the “threat of the run”
You just go back and forth from narrative to narrative - sbroads24
“Daring the chiefs to run” in the very last sentence of that same post.
Location: Look, it's a situation where thats a great question, OH Joined: 07.01.2020
Dec 22 @ 2:41 PM ET
Right and my horse has everything to do with how you win in the playoffs against elite opponents.
But for arguments sake in the one matchup against the Chiefs this year was Kansas City not balanced on offence because the game dictated them to be ?
In the battle of quite possibly the two best teams in the AFC and two best QB’s in the AFC the Chiefs running game was a huge part of winning that game due to the Bills forcing their hand and daring them to beat them on the ground. - Pegullaville
Sure if everything goes out way they could be ok. I wouldn’t bank on it.
It was a no brainer position to upgrade with multiple trade/FA options out there
We don’t have a #1 goalie and our #2 might not be playable
There’s just no excuse - sbroads24
Do we get Hall and Staal if we get a goalie?
I think Ullmark isn't far off from being a full time starter especially since he had to do a lot of the lifting last year on the back end.
Shortened season can only help this team the way we've played the last couple years.
Its biased towards QB’s for a very distinct reason - they’re the reasons why their teams win - sbroads24
There are QB’s you can win with, and not necessarily because of.
The Rams don’t win because of Jared Goff, but they do win with him.
The Saints this year haven’t won because of Drew Brees, but they are winning with him. In fact the Saints are 10-1 in their last 11 games while Brees has been hurt the past two seasons. 4 of those games QB’d be a TE with the other 7 QB’d by the same guy at the helm of the 4-10 Panthers.
The Browns the last few weeks have won because of Baker Mayfield which is a change of pace.
The Texans sure as hell aren’t losing because of Deshaun Watson. Ditto Justin Herbert in LA.
QB wins as a stat are misleading, QB MVP’s are too for the most part.
I don’t understand how Mahomes wins MVP last year when if the Chiefs don’t shut down the 49ers they are down by a lot more than 10 points and his late game heroics would have just been garbage time passing numbers
There are QB’s you can win with, and not necessarily because of.
The Rams don’t win because of Jared Goff, but they do win with him.
The Saints this year haven’t won because of Drew Brees, but they are winning with him. In fact the Saints are 10-1 in their last 11 games while Brees has been hurt the past two seasons. 4 of those games QB’d be a TE with the other 7 QB’d by the same guy at the helm of the 4-10 Panthers.
The Browns the last few weeks have won because of Baker Mayfield which is a change of pace.
The Texans sure as hell aren’t losing because of Deshaun Watson. Ditto Justin Herbert in LA.
QB wins as a stat are misleading, QB MVP’s are too for the most part.
I don’t understand how Mahomes wins MVP last year when if the Chiefs don’t shut down the 49ers they are down by a lot more than 10 points and his late game heroics would have just been garbage time passing numbers - Pegullaville
Not sure I would throw Goff, rams and winning in the mix to make your case 48 hours after they lost to the Jets
