Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael Pachla: The 2020-21 season is upon us. A look at the Buffalo Sabres
Author Message
Gr8daygo
Joined: 04.23.2014

Feb 17 @ 9:06 PM ET
Different issue. Even if they change it from top to bottom, is a cup parade going to come to buffalo by the end of eichels contract? If no, almost assuredly no, make the move now and get a max return. It sucks, I agree.
- TheHank


Same issue... ok, say your premise is right, the cheap management structure won’t win you any trades and won’t use those assets properly to build the team properly.
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres
Location: BUFFALO , NY
Joined: 12.03.2015

Feb 17 @ 9:06 PM ET
Oh I think it's an answer.

3 years after we trade Eichel you'll be sitting there with gunpowder on your face wondering how the roadrunner got the best of you

- jcragcrumple


It's kinda a conundrum.

How many seasons before his no trade clause? 2

What if he plays like he is currently, the rest of this season.

Still want him for the next 5?


You will never get enough in return for eichel.
I completely agree with you.
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Feb 17 @ 9:07 PM ET
You're advocating for the same flawed logic that saw us get Tage Thompson and Vlad Sobotka for ROR.

It was a terrible idea then, and it's a terrible idea now.

Maybe in 5 years you can tell us we should trade Spencer Fisher who has 80 points in 82 games because we never retain talent and the rest of the team sucks and we're bottom-10 still

- jcragcrumple

Really and what have we done in 6 years with him? so we are supposed to just keep missing the playoffs until he wants out.This team is going no place fast.
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY
Joined: 02.12.2012

Feb 17 @ 9:07 PM ET
You're advocating for the same flawed logic that saw us get Tage Thompson and Vlad Sobotka for ROR.

It was a terrible idea then, and it's a terrible idea now.

Maybe in 5 years you can tell us we should trade Spencer Fisher who has 80 points in 82 games because we never retain talent and the rest of the team sucks.

- jcragcrumple

It’s not the same logic at all. What are you even talking about?

The logic in trading Eichel is rebuilding the entire build of your roster

Did we rebuild when we traded ROR

And you have yet to answer what happened to Colorado when they also traded Ryan O’Reilly for almost nothing
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:07 PM ET
I do hear ya
But the good thing in our favor if we decide to trade Jack is that we won’t have a timeline that hinders the return we’d get

This is assuming we don’t rush into a bad deal,
of course

- jdfitz77

Agreed.

Would you do it then? Seriously.
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 17 @ 9:10 PM ET
You're advocating for the same flawed logic that saw us get Tage Thompson and Vlad Sobotka for ROR.

It was a terrible idea then, and it's a terrible idea now.


- jcragcrumple

we also got miller and Ryan Johnson for ror
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:10 PM ET
Same issue... ok, say your premise is right, the cheap management structure won’t win you any trades and won’t use those assets properly to build the team properly.
- Gr8daygo

Fair enough. So you’re advocating for just being a 25th place team forever? It sucks either way. I’m spent.
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:11 PM ET
we also got miller and Ryan Johnson for ror
- homiedclown

Don’t forget berglund!
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 17 @ 9:11 PM ET
It's kinda a conundrum.

How many seasons before his no trade clause? 2

What if he plays like he is currently, the rest of this season.

Still want him for the next 5?


You will never get enough in return for eichel.
I completely agree with you.

- Boss34

jack's NMC kicks in after the 21-22 season


so if your trading him, the time is this off season
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Feb 17 @ 9:12 PM ET
we also got miller and Ryan Johnson for ror
- homiedclown

Trade them all and start over yet again but if they keep Krueger, there is no point. It will just be rinse, wash, repeat.
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 17 @ 9:12 PM ET
Don’t forget berglund!
- TheHank

Vontae Davis lite
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Feb 17 @ 9:13 PM ET
Max Domi
Conor Garland
and 2 picks
Could have been Sabres if Botts would have gotten the Ok on ROR bonus, they hesitated for to long and 2 days later Domi was a Canadian
Frizzlefry
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Don't get so high and mighty about your superiority over Lockport, NY
Joined: 10.10.2015

Feb 17 @ 9:14 PM ET
There’s still a TON of work to do in there to renovate it
Only the main level was done
It’s gonna take years to complete

- jdfitz77


A lot of floors are already gutted. He’s had heavy equipment in the basement clearing it out for a while. The guy gets poop done. He’ll have people moving in there before you know it.
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Feb 17 @ 9:14 PM ET
It’s not the same logic at all. What are you even talking about?

The logic in trading Eichel is rebuilding the entire build of your roster

Did we rebuild when we traded ROR

And you have yet to answer what happened to Colorado when they also traded Ryan O’Reilly for almost nothing

- sbroads24


Yes, for 2 seasons under Botterill while Pegulaville told us that salvation was a Mittlestadt, Dahlin or Cozens away.

We wandered the wilderness for 10 years from 2006-2015 looking for a 1C, and now all of you are so ready to jump back into it. There is recent historical precedence on THIS team to demonstrate that this logic is faulty.

You trade him and you spend the next ten years searching for him
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:15 PM ET
Max Domi
Conor Garland
and 2 picks
Could have been Sabres if Botts would have gotten the Ok on ROR bonus, they hesitated for to long and 2 days later Domi was a Canadian

- Buff36

No poop? What picks? Any word?
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Feb 17 @ 9:16 PM ET
we also got miller and Ryan Johnson for ror
- homiedclown


That changes my opinion entirely of the trade
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Feb 17 @ 9:17 PM ET
Yes, for 2 seasons under Botterill while Pegulaville told us that salvation was a Mittlestadt, Dahlin or Cozens away.

We wandered the wilderness for 10 years from 2006-2015 looking for a 1C, and now all of you are so ready to jump back into it. There is recent historical precedence on THIS team to demonstrate that this logic is faulty.

You trade him and you spend the next ten years searching for him

- jcragcrumple

And where are we going with him ?they brought in Jeff Skinner, Hall, Staal and others and we still suck. Stop already.
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Feb 17 @ 9:18 PM ET
We still can't make the playoffs but hey, atleast we can still pay Eichel 10 mill a year
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY
Joined: 02.12.2012

Feb 17 @ 9:20 PM ET
Yes, for 2 seasons under Botterill while Pegulaville told us that salvation was a Mittlestadt, Dahlin or Cozens away.

We wandered the wilderness for 10 years from 2006-2015 looking for a 1C, and now all of you are so ready to jump back into it. There is recent historical precedence on THIS team to demonstrate that this logic is faulty.

You trade him and you spend the next ten years searching for him

- jcragcrumple

This is just false man. We did nothing of the sort -

Our franchise player the year we had ROR - Jack Eichel, year after - Jack Eichel

The #1 defensemen the year we had ROR - Rasmus Ristolainen , year after - Ristolainen

Our top line RW- Sam Reinhart - next year - Sam Reinhart

Our goalies the year we had him- bad - our goalies the year after - bad

Our top checking forwards - Larsson, Girgensons, year after - Larsson, Girgensons

We literally still have most of these guys
Da_Cashman
Buffalo Sabres
Location: London, ON
Joined: 04.18.2011

Feb 17 @ 9:20 PM ET
The result will be the same. We look like idiots and we get some version of a tall, spinning idiot in return while Eichel wins a cup
- jcragcrumple


I wish I could steal the name Tall Spinning Idiot. Bravo!
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Feb 17 @ 9:20 PM ET
And where are we going with him ?they brought in Jeff Skinner, Hall, Staal and others and we still suck. Stop already.
- SABRES 89


This mess is no more Eichel's fault than it was ROR's fault. And when you inevitably get your way and the Sabres run him out of town as we do with all our good players, you'll realize "huh, maybe it wasn't his fault"

Or more likely, we'll do this again in 5 years with a player not yet drafted
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:21 PM ET
We still can't make the playoffs but hey, atleast we can still pay Eichel 10 mill a year
- SABRES 89

Insert Malkevich rounders gif.
Frizzlefry
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Don't get so high and mighty about your superiority over Lockport, NY
Joined: 10.10.2015

Feb 17 @ 9:21 PM ET
Rumors that the Hilton empire has or is buying it
- jdfitz77

Not true.
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:22 PM ET
This mess is no more Eichel's fault than it was ROR's fault. And when you inevitably get your way and the Sabres run him out of town as we do with all our good players, you'll realize "huh, maybe it wasn't his fault"

Or more likely, we'll do this again in 5 years with a player not yet drafted

- jcragcrumple

So just keep on keeping on 25th place?
TheHank
Location: Yawn.
Joined: 01.11.2017

Feb 17 @ 9:23 PM ET
Not true.
- Frizzlefry

BOOM
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486  Next