Pouty for a 1st and a defense prospect,
Hughes for a 1st and a prospect
Garland for a 2nd
Boeser for a bag of used pucks
Miller 25%retained, for Lafreniere
Bo(re-signed) for 1 of Habs 2 top 10 picks
Kuzmenko for a 1st from Flames
Mikheyev a 2nd for Tampa
Schenn a 2nd from Boston
Bear a 2nd from Ottawa
Lazar a 3rd from Buffalo
Myers 50% retained for a 2nd from Oilers
OEL 50% retained for another bag of used pucks
Demko to Los Angeles for a 1st.

Picks can be in 2023 or 2024 draft. The used pucks can be in the 2030 off-season.
- Reubenkincade

For poops and giggles, assume all these moves are made before or at the trade deadline, please create a roster out of what's left... I need a laugh.

So about the same as a 3rd liner?
- Retinalz

Each year, the market changes, moreover this year, with teams being at the cap. Also, very few of these teams have much to offer in the way of good young players, that this management team covets, and several don't even have a 1st round pick to offer.

So, you either take the best offer, or youre-sign Bor/let him walk into free-agency.
Although I would like to see a bigger return for Bo, as I think he is a good player, I only see maybe 3 of the current playoff teams, with what is hoped for, coming back to Vancouver.

For poops and giggles, assume all these moves are made before or at the trade deadline, please create a roster out of what's left... I need a laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

Nighthawk is the roster guy and I already get a good laugh at how bad this group is.

Nighthawk is the roster guy and I already get a good laugh at how bad this group is.
- Reubenkincade

I wish Amar Doman owned the Canucks.

For poops and giggles, assume all these moves are made before or at the trade deadline, please create a roster out of what's left... I need a laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

I wish Amar Doman owned the Canucks.
- Marwood

An excellent choice.

- Nucker101

For poops and giggles, assume all these moves are made before or at the trade deadline, please create a roster out of what's left... I need a laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

Martin
Delia

Stillman Burroughs
Rathbone Woolanin
Dermott Woo

Karlsson Studnika Podkolzin
Lockwood Åmon di Guisseppe
Joshua Dries Pederson
Arseneau Dowling Klimovich
Lafrienere

Edit, I bet this group would have a better PK % than the current Canucks…

Nighthawk is the roster guy and I already get a good laugh at how bad this group is.
- Reubenkincade

If they did all of that, given there would be hits and misses, how long until they were back to at least as good as they are now, but with a bright future? 3 years? 4? Sooner?

I’m thinking 3 years tops to get back to .500.

For poops and giggles, assume all these moves are made before or at the trade deadline, please create a roster out of what's left... I need a laugh.
- bloatedmosquito

This oughta be real funny 😂😂

Nighthawk is the roster guy and I already get a good laugh at how bad this group is.
- Reubenkincade

Aah your teardown your roster. C’mon get on it you lazy fuq lol

Pouty for a 1st and a defense prospect,
Hughes for a 1st and a prospect
Garland for a 2nd
Boeser for a bag of used pucks
Miller 25%retained, for Lafreniere
Bo(re-signed) for 1 of Habs 2 top 10 picks
Kuzmenko for a 1st from Flames
Mikheyev a 2nd for Tampa
Schenn a 2nd from Boston
Bear a 2nd from Ottawa
Lazar a 3rd from Buffalo
Myers 50% retained for a 2nd from Oilers
OEL 50% retained for another bag of used pucks
Demko to Los Angeles for a 1st.

Picks can be in 2023 or 2024 draft. The used pucks can be in the 2030 off-season.
- Reubenkincade

I suppose all these traded picks are in the lower 3rd of the draft order. But at least you have guaranteed the team to be picking in the bottom 5 for the next decade.

If they did all of that, given there would be hits and misses, how long until they were back to at least as good as they are now, but with a bright future? 3 years? 4? Sooner?

I’m thinking 3 years tops to get back to .500.
- 1970vintage

In the past, I have said it would take about 5 years to clear up this mess, I believe if they could do something like what I was sarcastically saying, it would be about 5 years. IMO.

I doubt very much that any team would be able to tear it down like that, but if they could, I would be the 1st to compliment this management group.

I suppose all these traded picks are in the lower 3rd of the draft order. But at least you have guaranteed the team to be picking in the bottom 5 for the next decade.
- Quinn's Quest

which sadly isn't much worse than their record when they actually try to win

So about the same as a 3rd liner?
- Retinalz

You aren’t being realistic on the returns. For any of our players

You aren’t being realistic on the returns. For any of our players
- CanuckDon

I think the Bo and Schenn returns will be solid since they're the type of players that contending teams covet. But yes, Canuck fans overvalue the trade value of guys like Boeser and Garland.

If we were fans of contending teams like the Canes for example, I would laugh at any idiot who suggested trading a pick for Boeser's contract

which sadly isn't much worse than their record when they actually try to win


- Nucker101

Some people think a rebuild is done in 2 years, when realistically, it takes a minimum of 5 years, but more like 8 years.

I think the Bo and Schenn returns will be solid since they're the type of players that contending teams covet. But yes, Canuck fans overvalue the trade value of guys like Boeser and Garland.

If we were fans of contending teams like the Canes for example, I would laugh at any idiot who suggested trading a pick for Boeser's contract
- Nucker101

After the fiasco from not moving any signicant players out, over the past decade, I would be happy getting a good young player/prospect and a 1st, for any player the Canucks have
This way, I am not setting myself up for disappointment on a return.

Some people think a rebuild is done in 2 years, when realistically, it takes a minimum of 5 years, but more like 8 years.
- Reubenkincade

I'll still laugh at all the media clowns and the also the dumb fans back in like 2012 or 2013 who pushed the "this fanbase won't accept a rebuild" narrative.

This team has tried to make the playoffs every year and re-tool on the fly which is even harder than rebuilding successfully. And the results have sucked for the last 8 seasons and yet the fans still care. It's American fans that are in cities with NFL/MLB/NBA teams that dont give a poop about rebuilding hockey teams, not canadian hockey fans who are obsessed.


Might be the dumbest narrative I've seen that people actual buy into. Even John Shannon pushes that narrative until this day.

It's a cop out for an impatient dumb owner and anyone who truly believes it has their head in the ground.

Abbotsford Canucks.
- TurdFergeson

Obviously, part of the returns would include some bottom end players, that can help fill out a roster, or are minor cap dumps.
The team still has to meet the cap floor.

I think the Bo and Schenn returns will be solid since they're the type of players that contending teams covet. But yes, Canuck fans overvalue the trade value of guys like Boeser and Garland.

If we were fans of contending teams like the Canes for example, I would laugh at any idiot who suggested trading a pick for Boeser's contract
- Nucker101

It’s clear to all intelligent hockey fans that Boeser is a negative value asset. The return for Bo will stink and Schenn will be a 2nd which is close to worthless. Lottery picks are gold but Bo won’t warrant one. We also won’t receive a blue chip prospect. It will be a reclamation project and a late 1st

I'll still laugh at all the media clowns and the also the dumb fans back in like 2012 or 2013 who pushed the "this fanbase won't accept a rebuild" narrative.

This team has tried to make the playoffs every year and re-tool on the fly which is even harder than rebuilding successfully. And the results have sucked for the last 8 seasons and yet the fans still care. It's American fans that are in cities with NFL/MLB/NBA teams that dont give a poop about rebuilding hockey teams, not canadian hockey fans who are obsessed.


Might be the dumbest narrative I've seen that people actual buy into. Even John Shannon pushes that narrative until this day.

It's a cop out for an impatient dumb owner.
- Nucker101

When they brought Benning in, I thought they were definitely going to go the rebuild route. I understood he filling the age gap, although I didn't agree with it, but I was wrong on the direction he chose, which was somewhat understandable, because of the Sedins.
8 years later the team is in the same boat, because they traded picks and now have the holes because of trading all those picks.
It becomes a vicious cycle.

I'll still laugh at all the media clowns and the also the dumb fans back in like 2012 or 2013 who pushed the "this fanbase won't accept a rebuild" narrative.

This team has tried to make the playoffs every year and re-tool on the fly which is even harder than rebuilding successfully. And the results have sucked for the last 8 seasons and yet the fans still care. It's American fans that are in cities with NFL/MLB/NBA teams that dont give a poop about rebuilding hockey teams, not canadian hockey fans who are obsessed.


Might be the dumbest narrative I've seen that people actual buy into. Even John Shannon pushes that narrative until this day.

It's a cop out for an impatient dumb owner and anyone who truly believes it has their head in the ground.
- Nucker101

When they brought Benning in, I thought they were definitely going to go the rebuild route. I understood he filling the age gap, although I didn't agree with it, but I was wrong on the direction he chose, which was somewhat understandable, because of the Sedins.
8 years later the team is in the same boat, because they traded picks and now have the holes because of trading all those picks.
It becomes a vicious cycle.
- Reubenkincade

Sadly it looks like the cycle is containing. More picks/prospects being traded for other team's scraps and multiple insiders suggesting that they want NHL-ready players at C/D if they trade Horvat.


No one is trading good young NHL C/D, they're too valuable to both rebuilding teams and contenders because of their age and cheap cap hits. You're going to get stuck with Roslovic/Newhook/Peeke types, you're not getting a Byram or Lundell.

I'll still laugh at all the media clowns and the also the dumb fans back in like 2012 or 2013 who pushed the "this fanbase won't accept a rebuild" narrative.

This team has tried to make the playoffs every year and re-tool on the fly which is even harder than rebuilding successfully. And the results have sucked for the last 8 seasons and yet the fans still care. It's American fans that are in cities with NFL/MLB/NBA teams that dont give a poop about rebuilding hockey teams, not canadian hockey fans who are obsessed.


Might be the dumbest narrative I've seen that people actual buy into. Even John Shannon pushes that narrative until this day.

It's a cop out for an impatient dumb owner and anyone who truly believes it has their head in the ground.
- Nucker101

Back then fans were spoiled & wanted more. The media just played them. The reality was an aging team loaded with NTC’s was left behind. That alone said we were 5yrs behind in rebuilding. No cup no prospects & no GM was going to toss lifelines. FA cans GMMG & began the milking of the fans. He built nothing just the Aquillin’s bank account. Takes no vision to make money in this market.

Slum lords to the end…