BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
www.hockeybuzz.com
Just send a message to the owner, Eklund. He'll hook you up. - jugkope
Alright, will do. |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
I’ve been telling him that for years.
Wait…there’s other platforms?? - pete26
his OnlyFans account I think |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
If Kapanen is that good, could they send Dvorak to Laval at the start of the season? |
|
BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
If Kapanen is that good, could they send Dvorak to Laval at the start of the season? - deadpoulet
Wouldn't count on it. |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
If Kapanen is that good, could they send Dvorak to Laval at the start of the season? - deadpoulet
that would probably be the best way to make sure you aren't trading him lol
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
that would probably be the best way to make sure you aren't trading him lol - Pat1993
Armia went there last season |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Armia went there last season - deadpoulet
sure but that was a different situation, things weren't going well at all for Armia, especially confidence-wise, and there probably weren't many teams interested in acquiring him. Dvorak is UFA, he needs to play in the NHL to generate any interest. |
|
jugkope
|
|
Location: Possibly at the Zoo Joined: 07.19.2009
|
|
|
Armia went there last season - deadpoulet
And we haven't traded him. |
|
BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
And we haven't traded him. - jugkope
Just what I was thinking |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
And we haven't traded him. - jugkope
If they cant trade Dvorak, is that not an option? I dont think hes an easy player to trade with that cap and its NHL or Europe for Kapanen |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
If they cant trade Dvorak, is that not an option? I dont think hes an easy player to trade with that cap and its NHL or Europe for Kapanen - deadpoulet
he isn't, but teams sometimes get desperate around the TDL when injuries occur.
|
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
And we haven't traded him. - jugkope
that too
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
he isn't, but teams sometimes get desperate around the TDL when injuries occur. - Pat1993 And Kapanen would be in Europe for the year by then |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
And Kapanen would be in Europe for the year by then - deadpoulet
that's for Hughes and Gorton to figure out lol, if they really want to keep him here they'll surely find a way.
|
|
Garfield512
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I'm a figment of your imagination. Joined: 11.09.2006
|
|
|
If Kapanen is that good, could they send Dvorak to Laval at the start of the season? - deadpoulet
Kapanen was excellent last night and he really opened my eyes ... but we have to remember that we fans have only seen a short sample of him so far (last night was pretty much against an AHL team).
This being said, I really like his skills and vision on the ice.
I'm sure Marty will do what's best for the team. |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
that's for Hughes and Gorton to figure out lol, if they really want to keep him here they'll surely find a way. - Pat1993
My point is that Laval could be a way... |
|
pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: (HE, HIM, HIS), ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
And Kapanen would be in Europe for the year by then - deadpoulet
Which would be ok imo.
D’Vo is a pretty decent third liner, move him at the tdl.
Another one of Bergeron’s plugs off the books.. |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
Which would be ok imo.
D’Vo is a pretty decent third liner, move him at the tdl.
Another one of Bergeron’s plugs off the books.. - pete26
If they want to take their time, thats fine |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
My point is that Laval could be a way... - deadpoulet
I don't know if that would be ideal asset management, there's probably a better way. besides Kapanen is 21 and it's been 1 pre-season game, he needs to continue proving himself, we'll see. |
|
jugkope
|
|
Location: Possibly at the Zoo Joined: 07.19.2009
|
|
|
Which would be ok imo.
D’Vo is a pretty decent third liner, move him at the tdl.
Another one of Bergeron’s plugs off the books.. - pete26
Resign him 4x4M. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
My point is that Laval could be a way... - deadpoulet
He would be claimed
No need to send him down. The kid is good but DVo is an nhl vet that plays perfectly his role on the 3rd |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Which would be ok imo.
D’Vo is a pretty decent third liner, move him at the tdl.
Another one of Bergeron’s plugs off the books.. - pete26
now they only need to get rid of Suzuki, Caufield, Montembeault and Guhle. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135 Next |