would you (frank)ers that are giving up on drysdale so quick give up on luke hughes also?
- 2Real
There's a difference between giving up and giving an assessment of what the player has demonstrated so far. We want to see progress.
Some people want to ignore his 4 years/150 games/3000 minutes in the league when assessing him and others don't.
Luke Hughes at 84 games is a much better player than Drysdale at 150 games. The Devils would laugh at the Flyers if they tried to trade Drysdale for Hughes. If you asked 100 people which player they would rather have on their team, it would be 100-0 Hughes.
Drysdale will get plenty of opportunities this year to change the narrative and i don't see how he won't improve as there is no real way for him to be worse. In his 27 game sample size, TDA played better and Torts played 5 dmen rather than put him on the ice.
Let's hope he finds his groove because the Flyers need this trade to work out. Also, since Torts doesn't believe in systems, perhaps he could ask Shaw to change to a man to man defensive system as that's what Drysdale was comfortable in.
As a follow up question, if Luke Hughes was on the Flyers, could the Flyers develop him into a top pair dman? I don't think so.